Friday, June 26, 2015

Translink Police lying about Stats ?

March 3, 2013. If a public company gave one set of sales numbers to its board of directors, another to its shareholders, and a third to its auditors the chit would hit the fan with gusto."Incredibly, that’s precisely what has happened with the Transit Police.

In late February, the union and police brass did a local media tour, trying to drum up support for their beleaguered force. The next week, they released crime statistics showing what a bang-up job they’re doing. Or not.
Comparing their 2010 crime statistics in the new report, released March 4, and last spring’s Vancouver Police Department (VPD) operational review, has revealed a significant problem – they don’t match.

The VPD review reports Transit Police investigated 592 violent crimes in 2010. The new report says 615 – an addition of 4 per cent. The VPD review claims Transit Police dealt with 1,065 property crimes in 2010. The new report says 1,229 – an addition of 15 per cent. And the VPD review says Transit Police dealt with 296 police obstruction issues in 2010. The new report says 359 – an addition of 21 per cent.

This statistical sweetening continues throughout several categories: 12 per cent more disturbances, 15 per cent more weapons possessions, 15 per cent more drug cases, 44 per cent more emergency health or fire assists and 29 per cent more disturbed persons. Astonishingly, a third set of 2010 crime numbers – with even fewer reported incidents than the VPD review stats – was given to the Transit Police Board in March 2011.
The combined violent and property crime rate on the transit system decreased by 6.8 per cent from 2008 to 2010. Sounds good, until you consider that the crime rate across the Lower Mainland as a whole decreased by 13.9 per cent. Over five years, the Transit Police is expected to grow 25 per cent.

No wonder the Transit Police were a 2013 finalist for the Canadian Taxpayers Federation’s (CTF) signature Teddy Waste awards, which recognize the governments, public office holders, government employees, departments or agencies that most exemplify runaway government waste."